iOS feature request board
WishKit does not support Android — its SwiftUI/UIKit SDK ships for iOS, iPadOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and visionOS only. FeedbackJar is the WishKit alternative for Android: native SDKs for Android (Kotlin), iOS (Swift), Flutter, and React Native, all posting to one feature board, plus a web widget and MCP for coding agents. Plans start at $9/mo with a 7-day trial.
FeedbackJar
From $9/mo
3 plans · 7-day trial · no card · Android, iOS, Flutter, RN included
WishKit
Free – $15/mo+
Free plan (1 project) · Premium $15/mo · Enterprise $39/mo — verify at wishkit.io
Platform coverage
4 native SDKs + web
FeedbackJar: Android, iOS, Flutter, React Native, and a web widget
Indie developers and product teams shipping Android — alone or alongside iOS — who want an in-app feature board with a real native SDK on every platform, not a WebView bolted onto an iOS-only tool.
Looking for WishKit alternatives? Below is a practical WishKit vs FeedbackJar comparison — pricing, setup, widgets, bug metadata, and MCP.
| Feature | FeedbackJar ★ | WishKit |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Android, iOS, Flutter, React Native, Web | iOS, iPadOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, visionOS + web widget |
| Android SDK | ✓ Kotlin, Maven Central, min SDK 21 | ✗ None |
| Flutter / React Native | ✓ Both (pub.dev + npm) | ✗ Neither |
| iOS native board UI | ✓ FeedbackJarBoard (SwiftUI) | ✓ SwiftUI / UIKit |
| Web widget | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes (embeddable board) |
| Feature voting | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Device metadata on submit | ✓ OS, model, screen, app version, locale | Not documented |
| MCP for coding agents | ✓ Claude Code, Cursor, etc. | ✗ Not offered |
| App Store review inbox | ✗ Not a store-review tool | ✗ Not a store-review tool |
| Starting price | From $9/mo | Free; Premium $15/mo, Enterprise $39/mo |
| Self-serve trial | ✓ 7 days, no card | ✓ Free plan, no card (no paid-tier trial) |
| Open-source SDKs (MIT on GitHub) | ✓ Android, iOS, Flutter, RN — all MIT | ✓ iOS SDK is MIT (no Android/Flutter/RN) |
Real install + init calls, straight from the SDK docs — no config beyond a widget ID.
// build.gradle.kts (app module)
dependencies {
implementation("com.feedbackjar:sdk:1.5.1")
}
// Application.onCreate()
FeedbackJar.init(this, "your-widget-id")
// Drop in the prebuilt board (Compose)
FeedbackJarBoard(accentColor = Color(0xFFE5484D))// Package.swift
.package(url: "https://github.com/feedbackjar/swift-sdk", from: "1.3.1")
// App init
FeedbackJar.configure(widgetId: "your-widget-id")
// Drop in the prebuilt board
FeedbackJarBoard()MCP is becoming table stakes. FeedbackJar’s edge is the repro context agents get (browser, OS, console, URL) and automatic voter notify when status hits Done.
1. Capture context
Widget attaches browser, OS, page URL, and console errors so agents can reproduce issues.
2. Triage via MCP
Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents list top posts, read that metadata, update status, and reply.
3. Close the loop
When status hits Done, every voter is notified automatically — no manual email chase.
Setup guides: MCP integrations · MCP server docs
Most teams evaluating WishKit alternatives care about price, time-to-value, and whether feedback actually gets fixed. FeedbackJar starts at From $9/mo, embeds in about 30 seconds, and attaches the metadata agents need. When status hits Done, every voter is notified automatically.
Prefer a multi-tool comparison? Read Canny vs Featurebase vs Productboard , browse all feedback tool alternatives , or compare UserJot vs FeedbackJar.
Install the feedback widget in 30 seconds. Connect MCP when you are ready for agents.
Start Free Trial